华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 84-88.

• 宗教学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

１９２１年前后关于柏格森哲学与佛学关系论辩之始末

姚彬彬   

  1. 武汉大学中国传统文化研究中心，武汉，４３００７２
  • 出版日期:2014-05-15 发布日期:2014-09-29
  • 通讯作者: 姚彬彬
  • 作者简介:姚彬彬

The Whole Course of the Debate on the Relationship between Bergsonism and Buddism around 1921

Yaobinbin   

  1. Chinese traditional culture research center of Wuhan University，Wuhan，430072
  • Online:2014-05-15 Published:2014-09-29
  • Contact: Yaobinbin
  • About author:Yaobinbin

RichHTML

7

PDF

1766

摘要： 在１９２１年前后，柏格森哲学风靡中国学界期间，出现了柏格森哲学与佛学相关性的论辩，章太炎、吕贗、梁漱溟、黎锦熙等人先后参与其中。章太炎、黎锦熙等认为柏格森哲学与佛学相通，以“直觉”、“生命冲动”等范畴相合于唯识学的阿赖耶识等观念，而吕贗、梁漱溟则对此持反对意见。本文通过考掘原始材料，将这一论辩之始末梳理出来。认为这二种对立的看法，也代表了中国思想界百余年来对待“中西比较”问题的不同典型态度。

关键词: 直觉, 生命冲动, 唯识学, 阿赖耶识

Abstract: Around the year 1921 when Bergsonism was wide spread in Chinese academia, the debate on the correlation between Bergsonism and Buddism appeared and Zhang Taiyan, Lv Cheng, Liang Shuming, Li Xijin and other famous scholars took part in this debate successively. Zhang and Li argued that Bergsonism and Buddism were related to each other and intuitionism, vital impetus and other categories conform to Alaya-consciousness and other thoughts in Vijnana-vada, whereas Lv and Liang held opposite opinion against this idea. Through exploring original materials, this thesis teases out the whole course of this debate and points out that this two opposite opinions represent the typical attitude toward the issue of “comparision between China and the West” among Chinese academia over a hundred years.

Key words: intuitionism, vital impetus, vijnana-vada, alayavijnana