华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 116-133.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2021.05.008

• 文学语言学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

释“才、学、识”:钱锺书的诗人修养论——对《沧浪诗话》“照着说”与“接着说”

夏中义   

  • 出版日期:2021-09-15 发布日期:2021-09-27
  • 作者简介:夏中义,浙江越秀外国语学院教授(绍兴,312000),上海交通大学人文学院教授;华东师范大学中文系1977级校友

Interpretation of QIAN Zhong-shu’s Theory of Poet Cultivation from “Talent,Knowledge and Insight”:QIAN’s Learning from and Development of Canglang Shihua

Zhong-yi XIA   

  • Online:2021-09-15 Published:2021-09-27

摘要:

当今的钱锺书研究,必须回应三个敏感点:一是钱作为20世纪学界读书最多的古典文化学者,其毕生著述有否相对聚焦的学科根基?二是钱著(《管锥编》尤甚)博识睿思,其纸背是否仅仅像纸面一般“散钱失串”,无甚系统?三是钱是否满足于当一个品鉴诗性趣味的精致学者,而不同时是因探索文学魅力而深入到文艺史暨批评史的卓越美学家?答问如下:其一,钱是“文化昆仑”,学贯中外古今,然其学涯着眼最细、着力最厚、耗时最久的学科根基,当为“古典诗学的现代转换”,简称“古典诗学新释”,南宋严羽《沧浪诗话》便系钱心中最具思想内涵的批评史文献。其二,只须不惮用十几年或数十年,对钱著作编年史(地毯式)细读,可以从中爬梳出“古典诗学新释”自有其逻辑自洽的内在理路,此即通过对古典“能文”→“修词”→“才、学、识”→“神韵”→“格调”→“探本”的有序阐释,来重构闪烁现代诗学光芒的“诗性本位论”→“诗语分子学”→“诗人修养论”→“诗贵清远说”→“诗分唐宋说”→“诗品伦理学”。其三,综上所述,钱是否为无愧于中华文艺史暨批评史的伟大学者,也就不言而喻。

关键词: 《沧浪诗话》, 才、学、识, 钱锺书, 诗人修养

Abstract:

Today’s research on QIAN Zhong-shu must respond to three sensitive points. First, does QIAN, as the crystallization of classical culture and the most extensive reader in the 20th century, have a relatively focused discipline foundation in his lifelong works? Second, are QIAN’s works (especially Guan Zui Bian), which seems to be not systematic despite of their being knowledgeable and filled with gifted insights, essentially like “scattering money and losing strings”? Third, is QIAN content to be an exquisite scholar who appreciates poetic taste, rather than an outstanding aesthetician who explores the charm of literature and goes deep into the history of literature and art and the history of criticism? The answers are as follows. First, dubbed as the “Kunlun of culture”, i.e., a giant in the cultural field, QIAN’s carried out his studies through ancient and modern times at home and abroad. However, there was a discipline foundation in his intellectual career in which he has invested most talent, energy, and time. This is “the modern transformation of classical poetics”, or “the new interpretation of classical poetics”. In QIAN’s view, Canglang Shihua compiled by YAN Yu in the Southern Song Dynasty is the ideal literature of critical history with the richest intellectual connotations. Second, after ten years’ or decades’ intensive reading, one can find out that QIAN’s “new interpretation of classical poetics” has its own self-consistent logic: By examining “writing”, “wording”, “talent, knowledge, insight”, “romantic charm”, “literary style” and “origin analysis” step by step, he has restructured the “doctrine of the original position of poetry”, “poetic molecules”, the “doctrine of the cultivation of poets”, the “idea that the value of poems lies in clearness and remoteness”, the stance of “dividing poetry mainly into Tang and Song poems” and the “ethics of poetry”, sparkling with brilliant modern poetic rays. Third, it is easy to draw the conclusion that QIAN is worthy of the title of a great scholar in the history of Chinese literature and art and the history of criticism.

Key words: Canglang Shihua, “talent, knowledge and insight”, QIAN Zhong-shu, poet cultivation