华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2013, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 33-39.

• 中国哲学与文化 • 上一篇    下一篇

牟宗三早期圆成论与后期合一论之比较

杨泽波   

  1. 复旦大学哲学学院,上海,200433
  • 出版日期:2013-09-15 发布日期:2013-11-06
  • 通讯作者: 杨泽波
  • 作者简介:杨泽波
  • 基金资助:

    本文为国家社会科学基金项目(04BZX033)和复旦大学“985工程”三期项目(2011RWXKZD010)的阶段性成果。

A Comparative Study of Mou Zongsan’s Early Theory of Perfection and Later Theory of Unity

YANG Ze-bo   

  • Online:2013-09-15 Published:2013-11-06
  • Contact: YANG Ze-bo
  • About author:YANG Ze-bo

摘要: 牟宗三的合一论可分为早期圆成论和后期合一论两个部分,两者之间有继承和发展的关系。尽管后期合一论较之早期圆成论更为完善,思想层面更高,但在一些重大理论环节上也有更多的失误。这主要表现在以无相作为新的合一的先验原则,以“放得下”论无相等方面。后期合一论更为曲折含混,复杂难解,就学理的准确性而言,尚不如早期圆成论。

关键词: 牟宗三, 美学, 合一论

Abstract: Mou Zongsan’s theory of unity consists of two sections: the early theory of perfection and the later theory of unity. Although the latter is more improved and at a higher spiritual level, it has more mistakes in some crucial theoretical issues, especially taking formlessness as a new a priori principle of unity and explaining formlessness with the concept of “putting down”. Because of these mistakes, Mou’s later theory of unity is much more confusing and complicated so that it is less accurate than his early theory of perfection.