华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 33-39.

• “知识与行动”专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

意向和行动:逻辑关系还是因果关系? 
——冯?赖特之逻辑关系论证

章素珍   

  1. 华东师范大学哲学系 上海200241
  • 出版日期:2014-01-15 发布日期:2014-03-02
  • 通讯作者: 章素珍
  • 作者简介:章素珍

Intention and Action:causal relation or logical relation? 
— A study on von Wright’s theory of logical connection argument

Zhang Su-zhen   

  1. Philosophy Department, East China Normal University
  • Online:2014-01-15 Published:2014-03-02
  • Contact: Zhang Su-zhen
  • About author:Zhang Su-zhen

摘要: 意向和行动是因果关系还是逻辑关系,是意向主义和因果主义争论的焦点。逻辑关系论证是意向主义哲学家早期用于反对因果主义的一种理论。冯?赖特支持逻辑关系论证,并为之提供了新的证明方式。但在行动和意向之间是强逻辑关系还是弱逻辑关系的问题上,冯?赖特早年支持强逻辑关系,而后又转向弱逻辑关系,也就是概念关系。这一转变反映了新维特根斯坦主义对行动说明所做的探索,即坚持行动说明的独特性,一方面要反对自然科学中因果说明的僭越,另一方面真正承认社会生活的丰富性,并在此基础上对行动说明给予合适的定位。

Abstract: The most controversial point between intentionalists and causalists is whether the relation of intention and action is logical or causal. Logical connection argument is posed by intentionalism to against causalism. Von Wright supports LCA and proves it in a new way. But concerning strong or weak logical relation, his view experienced a change from strong version into weak version. His view of change reflect the Neo-Wittgensteinian’ s probe on this subject, that is, to insist the peculiarity of explanation of action is to point out the misplace of causal explanation on one hand, and on another to base the explanation on the richness of social life which had to be accepted seriously.

Key words: logical independence, action, intention, logical relation, conceptual relation