华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 78-86.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2015.01.009

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

论历史建筑认定中公益与私益的平衡

李祎恒   

  1. 河海大学 法学院
  • 出版日期:2015-01-15 发布日期:2015-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 李祎恒
  • 作者简介:李祎恒
  • 基金资助:

    本文为国家社科基金项目（１１ＢＦＸ０６７）及中国博士后科学基金资助项目（２０１４Ｍ５５１４９３）的阶段性成果

On the Balance of Public and Private Interests in the Identification of Historical Buildings

Li Yi-heng   

  1. Law School, HoHai University
  • Online:2015-01-15 Published:2015-03-20
  • Contact: Li Yi-heng
  • About author:Li Yi-heng

RichHTML

5

PDF

763

被引次数

8

摘要： 历史建筑认定问题的特异性则在于，历史建筑认定的本质是公权力行为非剥夺性的限制，极少涉及剥夺历史建筑所有权的情况；而且，历史建筑既有可能存在于国有土地上，也有可能存在于集体所有的土地上，对这个问题的分析有助于我们突破土地所有制的束缚，而将目光放在统一不动产财产权征收补偿法制体系的建构上。而从我国目前征收补偿法制的情况来看，从征收概念的角度来建立和健全我国的征收补偿法制所面临的困顿局面是难以突破的。因此，或可从补偿的角度来完成这一任务。申言之，经由衡平补偿制度整合现有的补偿标准，以统一的补偿原则扩大征收概念的内涵，构建体系化的征收补偿法制。

关键词: 衡平补偿, 历史建筑, 征收

Abstract: The identification of historical buildings is essentially a kind of legal restriction on public power. Because the land-ownership of historical buildings is either state-owned or rural collective, the research on the identification of historical buildings can also help us free from the confine of landownership and focus on the construction of a unitary legal system of real property expropriation compensation. We may overcome the difficulties in China’s legal system of expropriation compensation from the perspective of expropriation rather than that of expropriation. In other words, we shall construct a legal system of expropriation compensation through equalization compensation.