华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 119-129.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2022.02.013

• 国家话语生态研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

众声喧哗中全球智库的疫情话语——基于布鲁金斯报告的框架分析

张虹倩, 冷知霖, 赵诗篇   

  • 接受日期:2022-02-21 出版日期:2022-03-15 发布日期:2022-03-28
  • 作者简介:张虹倩，华东师范大学国家话语生态研究中心、国际汉语文化学院副教授（上海，200062）|冷知霖，华东师范大学国际汉语文化学院硕士研究生|赵诗篇，华东师范大学国际汉语文化学院硕士研究生
  • 基金资助:
    上海市哲学社会科学规划青年课题“美国顶级智库‘中国知识’生产与传播机制研究”（项目编号：2020EXW001）

Discourses on the Epidemic from Global Think Tanks in the Clamor：A Framework Analysis Based on the Brookings Report

Hong-qian ZHANG, Zhi-lin LENG, Shi-pian ZHAO   

  • Accepted:2022-02-21 Online:2022-03-15 Published:2022-03-28

RichHTML

12

PDF

212

摘要：

西方舆论场是各种意见纷争的场域，既有某些政客制造出的种种极端性话语，但也不乏比较理性的声音。美国布鲁金斯学会被视为全球“卓越智库”，其研究报告追求独立分析，不仅深刻影响美国政府和社会舆论，也在一定程度上影响着全球的中国形象知识生产。以2019年12月以来布鲁金斯学会官网发布的一千多篇新冠议题报告为语料，借助话语的“框架分析”，可以清楚地看到，在布鲁金斯专家群主流看来：“新冠病毒”的大流行固然严重威胁着人类的生命安全，但“信息流行病”对于全球发展的危害同样不可小觑；美国的疫情失控在于美国政府自身的应对，不应推诿他人；“对抗”不符合中美的利益，更不符合全球的利益。对于西方这些较为理性的声音，我们也应该给予足够的关注，以全面把握全球思想市场的走向。

关键词: 智库话语, 框架分析, 知识生产与传播, 新冠疫情, 信息流行病

Abstract:

The field of public opinion in the West is a field of disputed opinions. There are various extreme discourses produced by certain politicians, but there are also some relatively rational voices. The Brookings Institution of the United States has been regarded as a global “Center of Excellence”. Its research reports pursue independent analysis, which not only profoundly influence the American government and public opinion, but also affect the global knowledge production of China’s image to a certain extent. Using more than 1,000 reports on the new coronavirus published on the Brookings Institution’s official website since December 2019, with the help of the “frame analysis” of discourse, it is clear that in the eyes of Brookings experts: the new coronavirus pandemic has seriously threatened the safety of human life, but the harm of “info-demic” to global development should also not be underestimated; the out-of-control of the US epidemic lies in the US government’s own response, and should not blame others; “confrontation” is not in the interests of China and the United States, and even less in the interests of the world. For these rational voices in the West, we should also pay enough attention in order to fully grasp the trend of the global thought market.

Key words: think tank discourse, framework analysis, knowledge production and dissemination, the new coronavirus epidemic, info-demic