华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2010, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 58-64.

• ● 佛教研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

论僧肇佛学的有无论与动静观

陈红兵   

  1. 南京大学 哲学系
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2010-03-25 发布日期:2010-03-25
  • 通讯作者: 陈红兵

On the Theory of Existence- Naught, the Views of Movement-quiescence of Seng Zhao’s Philosophy

CHEN Hong-bing   

  1. Philosophy Department of Nanjing University , Nanjing 210093,China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2010-03-25 Published:2010-03-25
  • Contact: CHEN Hong-bing

RichHTML

20

被引次数

3

摘要： 要真正理解僧肇佛学的有无论、动静观，必须将僧肇佛学纳入到其形成的社会历史文化环境中考察，研究其面对和回答的时代主题，及其吸收融合的不同思想文化资源。僧肇佛学的有无论、动静观主要包含两方面内涵：其一，从大乘佛教般若中观学说立场出发，提出“非有非无”、“非动非静”观念，否定魏晋玄学有无论、动静观关于现象世界和本体存在的实体性理解，从现象世界存在本性的角度论述了性空观（“不真”）和性住观（“不迁”）；其二，承续魏晋玄学的体用论主题，在“即体即用”的体用论基础上，阐发了有无一观（“即万物之自虚”）、“即动而求静”的观念。僧肇在正确理解和坚持般若中观学说的前提下，承续了魏晋玄学的理论主题和体用一如的理论意向，从思想理论的许多方面对般若中观学说与老庄玄学思想进行了融通，在推进魏晋玄学向前发展的同时，对佛教中国化的方式及趋势起了导向作用。

关键词: 僧肇, 《肇论》, 般若中观学说, 老庄玄学, 有无论, 动静观, 体用论

Abstract: We should fit Seng Zhao’s philosophy in the social historical cultural environment in which it formed, study the times theme that it faced and replied, study the different cultural resources that it had absorbed and fused. Seng Zhao’s theories of Existence- Naught and Movement-quiescence contain both connotations mainly: Firstly, From the view of Madhyamika Prajna, Seng Zhao put forward the views of "no-existence and no-naught" and "no-movement and no-quiescence", negated the views of metaphysics of Wei-jin, and illuminated the views of "no-real" and "no-move"; Secondly, Inheriting the theme of metaphysics of Wei-Jin, Seng Zhao illuminated the views of comprehending the naught from the existence and comprehending the quiescence from the movement on the basis of the theory of substance-function. Seng Zhao absorbed and fused both cultural resources of Madhyamika Prajna and the metaphysics of Wei-Jin, and promoted the development of the metaphysics of Wei-Jin and the sinologization of buddhism.

Key words: Seng Zhao, Madhyamika Prajna, the metaphysics of Wei-Jin, the theory about existence and naught, the view of movement and quiescence, the theory of substance-function