华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2011, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 48-54.

• 冯契研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

批判独断论、逻辑学与辩证法的论证 ——冯契的思考与探索

晋荣东   

  1. 华东师范大学哲学系 上海 200241
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-01-25 发布日期:2011-01-25
  • 通讯作者: 晋荣东

Critique of Dogmatism, Logic and Dialectical Argument ——Fengqi’s exploration

JIN Rong-dong   

  1. Department of Philosophy, East China University, Minhang, Shanghai, 200241
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2011-01-25 Published:2011-01-25
  • Contact: JIN Rong-dong

RichHTML

14

PDF

536

被引次数

11

摘要： 冯契揭示了独断论的理论失误之一在于无视思维的主体间之维，无视不同意见的争论是达到真理的具体途径；提出通过发展逻辑学、重视逻辑论证来批判独断论。尽管他对逻辑学的理解仍然局限于主客观关系的框架之下，以至于他提出的方法论基本原理并不能有效克服独断论的理论失误，但他对辩证法的论辩术本意的追溯以及“辩证法的论证”这一概念所具有的理论潜力，表明在冯契的相关论述中已经包含着克服盲点、发展洞见的可能性。

关键词: 独断论, 逻辑学, 辩证法, 冯契

Abstract: Fengqi reveals that one of weaknesses of dogmatism lies in its neglect of the intersubjective dimension of thinking and the debates among opinions as the basic approach to truth, and makes a proposal of criticizing dogmatism through developing logic and emphasizing logical argument. Even though his understanding of logic is still restricted to the frame of subjective-objective relationship and the essential principles of methodology of his own cannot effectively overcome the weakness of dogmatism, Fengqi’s attempt to trace dialectic in Hegelian and Marxist sense back to dialectic as the art of argumentation, and the theoretical potentiality of the concept of dialectical argument show that there is a possibility of making his proposal be more fruitful.

Key words: dogmatism, logic, dialectic, Fengqi