华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (4): 24-32.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2021.04.003

• 政治哲学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

“新辩证法”解读《资本论》的合理性考察——对阿瑟体系辩证法的批判性分析

陈永杰, 谭晓婷   

  • 出版日期:2021-07-15 发布日期:2021-07-19
  • 作者简介:陈永杰,江南大学马克思主义学院教授;谭晓婷,江南大学马克思主义学院硕士研究生(无锡,214122)
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金一般项目“马克思的本体论革命及其当代意义”(项目编号:19FZXB086);江苏高校哲学社会科学研究重大项目“马克思对思辨历史哲学的批判及其当代价值研究”(项目编号:2019SJZDA011)

On the Rationality of “New Dialectics” in the Interpretation of Das Kapital:A Critical Analysis of Arthur’s System Dialectics

Yong-jie CHEN, Xiao-ting TAN   

  • Online:2021-07-15 Published:2021-07-19

摘要:

“新辩证法”学派的克里斯多夫·阿瑟不满于对《资本论》的教条式解读,从黑格尔的辩证法出发对《资本论》进行了重建。阿瑟创造性地提出了体系辩证法,以价值形式为载体建构起了“辩证必然性”,以此阐明价值形式转换下的资本主义经济体系之生成过程。应当说,阿瑟的体系辩证法有助于我们理解价值形式在经济体系中的作用以及资本主义的内在矛盾。然而,由于阿瑟是从黑格尔的思辨理性出发,并且仅仅局限于资本主义内部讨论价值形式的演进历程,忽略了马克思辩证法思想中所蕴含的否定性、批判性等历史性原则,因此阿瑟不能不陷入将辩证法囿于形式层面抽象解读的窠臼之中。

关键词: 《资本论》, 体系辩证法, 价值形式, 历史性

Abstract:

Dissatisfied with the dogmatic interpretation of Das Kapital, Christopher J. Arthur of the school of “New Dialectics” reconstructed the work from Hegel’s dialectics. Arthur creatively proposed the system dialectics, constructed the “dialectical necessity” with the form of value as the carrier, and clarified the formation process of the capitalist economic system under the transformation of the value form. To some extent, Arthur’s system dialectics can help us understand the inherent contradictions of capitalism and the role of value forms in the economic system. However, since he started from Hegel’s speculative reason, and only confined to discussing the generation and demise of value forms within capitalism, Arthur ignored the historical principles of negativity and criticism contained in Marx’s dialectics. Therefore, he cannot help but fall into the trap of interpreting dialectics in the form of abstraction.

Key words: Das Kapital, system dialectics, value form, historical