华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2011, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 22-28.

• 中国哲学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

情感主义的儒家伦理 ——再论“子为父隐”

王美玲   

  1. 北京大学哲学系 北京，100871
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-03-30 发布日期:2011-03-30
  • 通讯作者: 王美玲

The Emotionalist ethics of Confucian ---to discuss “the son screen for the father from blame” again

Wang Meiling   

  1. The philosophy department of Peking University Peking, 100871
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2011-03-30 Published:2011-03-30
  • Contact: Wang Meiling

RichHTML

21

被引次数

7

摘要： 传统儒家伦理思想中倡导的“子为父隐”、“窃负而逃”、“埋儿葬父”这三个阶段中，一个连续的发展过程；因此只有将事件放在中华孝文化的大背景下，才能使其得到恰当的理解。“亲亲相隐”的始点和终点都是为了维护父子之情，或者更直接地说是为了实现孝道，而孝子的行为也是由对父亲的情感所决定的。先秦孔子对孝的规定是“隐”和“谏”是并重的，而后世承传往往只继承了他关于“隐”的部分，因此，孝子的行为才会逐渐走向“埋儿藏父”之类的极端化。

关键词: 情感主义, 子为父隐, 窃负而逃, 孝

Abstract: If the events such as the son screen for the father from blame be properly understood, they must be under the Chinese culture of filial piety. The son who screen for the father from blame is to safeguard the feelings between the father and the son or to realize filial duty and the behavior of the son is determined by the emotion to the father. Confucius paid the same attention to “screen” and “advise”, but the later ages only inherit “screen”. Therefore the behavior of the son is going to an extreme.

Key words: emotionalist ethics, the son screen for the father from blame, carry the father away from the crime, filial duty