华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 23-29.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2015.05.004

• 哲学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

当代中国马克思主义哲学研究的两个维度

郑忆石   

  1. 华东师范大学哲学系，上海 200241
  • 出版日期:2015-09-15 发布日期:2015-11-01
  • 通讯作者: 郑忆石
  • 作者简介:郑忆石

Theoretical Essence and Research Diversity: On the Two Dimensions of the Study of Marxist Philosophy in Today’s China

ZHENG Yi-Shi   

  1. Department of Philosophy in East China Normal University,ShangHai,200241
  • Online:2015-09-15 Published:2015-11-01
  • Contact: ZHENG Yi-Shi
  • About author: ZHENG Yi-Shi

RichHTML

5

PDF

993

被引次数

1

摘要： 当代中国马克思主义哲学在反思既往研究中的封闭性、独断性、教条化，强调开放性、多样性、个体性的同时，存在着以“价值中立”否认马克思主义理论基质的倾向。辩证分析这一现象，需要正确认识哲学的理论与现实、学术性与意识形态性、科学性与意识形态性、意识形态性中的“派别性”与“阶级性”等等关系，需要正确理解哲学研究中存在方式的同质与异质、研究方法的事实判断与价值判断、研究层次的学术层面与应用层面等等问题。实现中国马克思主义哲学研究理论基质与研究异质的统一，既要继续警惕将马克思主义理论仅仅当作纯粹意识形态的政治化理解方式，又必须坚持其理论内核和基本价值。

关键词: 马克思主义哲学, 价值中立, 理论基质, 研究异质

Abstract: As for the study of Marxist philosophy in today’s China, there is a tendency of denying the theoretical essence of Marxism in the name of “value neutrality”, together with reflecting on the closure, arbitrariness and dogmatization in the past and emphasizing upon the openness, diversity and individualism. It needs a dialectical analysis to correctly deal with the relationships between theory and reality, academics and ideology, science and ideology, the “party” nature and “class” nature of ideology and make a full understanding of the homogeny and heterogeneity in terms of existence, fact judgment and value judgment in terms of research approaches, academic study and applied research in terms of research levels. In order to unify the theoretical essence and research diversity in the study of Marxist philosophy in China, we shall be vigilant against politically viewing it as a pure ideological doctrine on the one hand and stick to the theoretical core and basic value of Marxism on the other.