华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 16-22.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2015.05.003

• 哲学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

论当代诠释学的任务

潘德荣   

  1. 华东师范大学哲学系,上海,200241
  • 出版日期:2015-09-15 发布日期:2015-11-01
  • 通讯作者: 潘德荣
  • 作者简介:潘德荣

On the Task of Contemporary Hermeneutics

PAN De-Rong   

  • Online:2015-09-15 Published:2015-11-01
  • Contact: PAN De-Rong
  • About author: PAN De-Rong

摘要: 诠释学的任务与诠释的对象密切相关。凡注重于文本或作者原意的诠释学,都具有方法论的特征。而植根于德国浪漫主义的本体论诠释学开启了诠释学的一个新的向度,它从意识本身的角度审视诠释现象。伽达默尔诠释学将“理解”本体论化,并将其作为此在的存在之根据,诠释学也因此从关于诠释技术的学说升华为“实践哲学”。诠释学也由此而直接转向了我们的生活世界,转向了我们自身的存在。正是这一转折,使哲学诠释学与认识论渐行渐远。不过,一旦诠释学与认识论分道扬镳,几乎无可避免地会滑向相对主义的理解观。诠释学究竟何去何从?我们从儒家、特别是其《易经》诠释传统中得到了一个深刻的启示。孔子解易“观亓德义”,凸显了诠释的道德向度。若我们将诠释学的任务定位为立德弘道之学,使所有的诠释活动都以“德行”为核心而展开,那么,诠释的方法论也不会沦为纯粹的技术性工具,伽达默尔的诠释学本体论也因具有了一个价值向度而得以避免陷入相对主义的泥潭。此乃当代诠释学所应取的发展方向。

关键词: 诠释学, 语言, 实践, 德行

Abstract: The task and object of hermeneutics are closely related. Hermeneutics, which attaches the importance to texts or the authors’ original meanings, is normally characterized by methodology. In contrast, the ontological hermeneutics rooted in German romanticism has initiated a new dimension that examines hermeneutic phenomena from the perspective of consciousness. Giving “understanding” an ontological status and regarding it as the foundation of Dasein, Gadamer’s hermeneutics is sublimated from a doctrine of interpreting techniques to a “practical philosophy”. Thus, hermeneutics directly turns to our life world and our own existence. It is this turning that has made philosophical hermeneutics gradually become apart from epistemology and unavoidable to result in a relativist concept of understanding. So, what is coming for hermeneutics? We can get a profound insight from Confucianism, especially from Confucian hermeneutic tradition of the Book of Changes (Yijing). In his interpreting Yijing to “observe its moral significance”, Confucius stresses the moral dimension of hermeneutics. If we define the task of hermeneutics as developing virtue and promoting the Dao and thus all hermeneutic activities are carried out surrounding “virtue”, hermeneutic methodology will not become a pure technical tool on the one hand and Gadamer’s hermeneutic ontology has a dimension of value so as to avoid the morass of relativism. This shall be the direction of contemporary hermeneutics.