华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (3): 38-47.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2023.03.005

• 政治哲学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

现代人如何彼此同情?——以休谟与卢梭的同情观为焦点

贾沛韬   

  • 接受日期:2023-03-27 出版日期:2023-05-15 发布日期:2023-05-30
  • 作者简介:贾沛韬,北京师范大学哲学学院讲师,北京师范大学天行教育哲学研究院助理研究员(北京,100875)
  • 基金资助:
    中国博士后科学基金面上资助(项目编号:2021M700488)、特别资助(项目编号:2022T150064);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助

How Modern Individuals Can Be Mutually Sympathetic:Hume and Rousseau on Sympathy

Pei-tao JIA   

  • Accepted:2023-03-27 Online:2023-05-15 Published:2023-05-30

摘要:

在关于自我与他人如何合群共存的探讨中,休谟和卢梭提供了两种内在一致且可协同生效的同情方案。作为典型的现代理论家,他们对同情的关注和这种关注对道德情感的共同倚重体现了现代伦理生活对人性与道德的内向探索和对日常生活的肯定。从这些共同的问题意识出发,两种世俗化且平等化的同情观着意强调了现代人能够基于自然的心灵内在构造而发挥道德情感的力量,葆有同情这种自然美德并坚持一种关照人类、超越立场和利益的普遍主义式同情姿态。进一步就具体的同情机制而言,休谟式同情体现为对一切苦乐感受和赞责评价的“同感共鸣”,卢梭式同情体现为对他人痛苦的“设身处地”,前者着眼于悲悯而冷静的旁观,后者着眼于自顾却热情的行动,它们共同导向了正义问题,有待当代阐释者甄别两种同情观的转型意味并由此探索如何借助同情改善社会。

关键词: 同情, 休谟, 卢梭, 道德情感

Abstract:

In the discussion about how the self and others can coexist harmoniously, Hume and Rousseau provide two internally consistent and synergistic conceptions of sympathy. As typical modern theorists, their focus on sympathy and their common emphasis on moral sentiments reflect modern ethical life’s introspective exploration of humanity and morality and affirmation of everyday life. Starting from this common problem awareness, these two secular and equalized sympathy views emphasize the modern human’s ability to exert the power of moral emotions based on the natural construct of the mind, maintain the natural virtues of sympathy, and adhere to a universalism-inspired sympathetic attitude beyond positions and interests, focusing on the care of humankind. Furthermore, in terms of specific sympathy mechanism, Hume’s sympathy embodies “fellow-feeling” for all the feelings of pleasure and pain, praise and blame, while Rousseau’s sympathy embodies “putting oneself in the other’s shoes” in the face of others’ pain; the former underlines a dispassionate and compassionate observation of sorrow, while the latter emphasizes a passionate self-concerned action, which jointly leads to the issue of justice. Contemporary interpreters need to distinguish between the transformative implications of these two sympathy views and explore how to use sympathy to improve society.

Key words: sympathy, Hume, Rousseau, moral sentiments