华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (3): 69-82.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2024.03.007

• 语言学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

重新认识句类的关系模式

王珏   

  • 出版日期:2024-05-15 发布日期:2024-06-05
  • 作者简介:王珏,上海交通大学人文学院教授(上海,200240)

A New Interpretation of the Relationship Patterns of Basic Sentence Types

Jue Wang   

  • Online:2024-05-15 Published:2024-06-05

摘要:

学界对陈述句、感叹句、疑问句和祈使句等四个基本句类之间的关系提出了4类8种模式。本文认为其中的“陈述句、感叹句对疑问句、祈使句”关系模式是互动性“弱-强”模式,并从三个方面补充论证其句法形式:一是已有句类标记的再认识;二是语调系统及其分工;三是语调和语气词的共现关系。结果发现,汉语句类标记大体形成一个相互排斥的替代选择系统,每个句子标记都可以分配到一种类型,且任何句子标记都不是一种以上类型的成员。据此,互动性“弱-强”关系模式里的两类四种句类都分别具有各自的句法形式,因此该模式可视为汉语句类关系的最佳模式。

关键词: 句类, 句类标记, 句类关系模式, “陈述句、感叹句对疑问句、祈使句”关系模式

Abstract:

The academic circle has proposed four categories and eight patterns to interpret the relationship between the four basic sentence types, that is, declarative sentences, exclamatory sentences, interrogative sentences and imperative sentences. This paper suggests that the relationship pattern of “declarative sentences and exclamatory sentences vs. interrogative sentences and imperative sentences” is an interactive “weak- strong” one, providing supplementary arguments from the following three aspects: (1) a new examination of existing sentence type markers; (2) the intonation system and its division of work; (3) the co-occurrence between intonations and modal particles. It shows that Chinese sentence type markers generally form a mutually exclusive system of alternatives, in which each sentence marker can be assigned to a type, and no sentence marker is a member of more than one types. Therefore, the four sentence types of the two categories in the interactive “weak- strong” relationship pattern have their respective syntactic forms, which shows that this pattern can be regarded as the best relationship pattern of Chinese sentence types.

Key words: sentence type, sentence type markers, relationship pattern of sentence types, relationship pattern of “declarative sentences and exclamatory sentences vs. interrogative sentences and imperative sentences”