华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (5): 89-102.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2024.05.009

• 法律前沿问题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

涉Sora等文生视频危害行为的刑法规制

刘宪权, 余越洋   

  • 出版日期:2024-09-15 发布日期:2024-10-11
  • 作者简介:刘宪权,华东政法大学功勋教授、“经天学者”讲席教授(上海,201620)|余越洋,华东政法大学刑事法学院博士研究生
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“网络时代的社会治理与刑法体系的理论创新”(项目编号:20&ZD199)。

Criminal Law Regulation of Harmful Behavior Related to Sora and Other Generated Videos

Xianquan Liu, Yueyang Yu   

  • Online:2024-09-15 Published:2024-10-11

摘要:

Sora等文生视频的应用将对刑法的法益理论产生重大影响。应将文生视频生成内容纳入作品范围。文生视频是其生成内容的作者但尚不是权利主体,应将相关著作财产权转移给使用人。涉文生视频强制猥亵、侮辱罪所侵害法益应当包括精神损害的内容。文生视频的应用改变了视频创作行业的社会关系,进而会改变相关犯罪行为法益侵害性程度的判断标准。涉文生视频犯罪主要涉及侵犯人身权利类犯罪、侵犯财产权利类犯罪以及寻衅滋事犯罪。司法解释对涉文生视频犯罪相关罪名构成要件的规定应当既有突破也有限制。我国刑法应设立数据安全责任事故罪以追究文生视频研发者、生产者的过失罪过下的刑事责任。应及时完善生成式人工智能产品应用的前置法规定。司法实践中应将文生视频的智能化程度区分为信息的整理、信息的基本加工、信息的深度加工三类,以此合理分配使用者、研发者与生产者所应当承担的涉文生视频犯罪的刑事责任。

关键词: 文生视频(Sora), 文生视频, 生成内容, 法益, 数据安全责任事故罪

Abstract:

The application of AI video generators such as Sora will have a significant impact on the legal interest theory of criminal law. The content of generated videos should be included in the scope of the work. An AI video generator is the author of its generated content but not the subject of rights, and the property rights of related works should be transferred to the user. The legal interests infringed upon by the crime of compulsory indecency and insult related to generated videos shall include the content of mental damage. The application of AI video generators changes the social relations of the video creation industry, and then changes the judgment standard of the degree of infringement of legal interests of related criminal behaviors. The crimes related to generated videos mainly involve crimes of infringing personal rights, crimes of infringing property rights and crimes of picking quarrels and provoking trouble. The provisions of judicial interpretation on the elements of the related charges of crime related to generated videos should have both breakthroughs and limitations. The criminal law of our country should set up the crime of data security liability accident to investigate the criminal responsibility of the developers and producers of generated videos. The pre-method provisions for the application of generative artificial intelligence products should be improved in time. In judicial practice, the intelligent degree of generated videos should be divided into three categories: information sorting, basic processing of information and deep processing of information, so as to reasonably allocate the criminal responsibility of users, developers and producers for crimes related to generated videos.

Key words: Sora, generated videos, generated content, legal interest, crime of data security liability accident