华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2012, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 78-85.

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

试论德沃金的整体性司法

唐丰鹤   

  1. 华东政法大学法学院, 上海, 200042
  • 出版日期:2012-07-15 发布日期:2012-09-12
  • 通讯作者: 唐丰鹤
  • 作者简介:唐丰鹤

On Dworkin’s Holistic Theory of Judiciary

TANG Feng-he   

  • Online:2012-07-15 Published:2012-09-12
  • Contact: TANG Feng-he
  • About author:TANG Feng-he

摘要: 实证主义向后看的司法模式和实用主义向前看的司法模式虽然都有合理的一面,却都失之偏颇,调和论的司法判决也无法在过去和未来之间建立一致性。德沃金整体性司法对法律的要求是解释性的判断,因而将回顾性和前瞻性的要素结合在一起。整体性司法把当代法律实践解释为正在逐步展开的政治叙事,从而为司法带来融贯性模式。然而,德沃金的整体性融贯却与现代社会的多元道德观格格不入,因而受到了拉兹的局部融贯论的攻击。

关键词: 实证主义, 实用主义, 整体性, 融贯性

Abstract: In spite of their reasonable aspects, both of the backward-looking judicial mode of positivism and forward-looking judicial mode of pragmatism are biased. The judicial judgments of conciliationism fail to establish consistency between the past and the future either. Since its request to law is explainable judgments, Dworkin’s holistic theory of judiciary combines retrospective factors and prospective ones. Holistic judiciary defines contemporary law practice as an evolving political narration. Therefore it provides a coherent judicial model. However, being out of tune with the pluralistic moralities in modern society, Dworkin's holistic coherentism is subject to the attacks of Raz’s partial coherentism.