华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2013, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 79-85.

• 冷战史研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

苏联与朝鲜战争:以联合国为研究平台的考察

宋晓芹   

  1. 山西大学历史文化学院,太原,030006
  • 出版日期:2013-11-15 发布日期:2014-02-24
  • 通讯作者: 宋晓芹
  • 作者简介:宋晓芹
  • 基金资助:

    本文为教育部人文社科研究项目规划基金“隐于幕后:苏联与朝鲜战争关系研究”(10YJA770045)和国家社会科学基金一般项目 “中国与战后初期东亚国际体系的构建研究(1945—1955)”(13BZS048)的阶段性成果。

The Soviet Union and the Korean War: An Examination Centering on Soviet Activities at the United Nations

SONG Xiao-qin   

  • Online:2013-11-15 Published:2014-02-24
  • Contact: SONG Xiao-qin
  • About author: SONG Xiao-qin

摘要: 战后初期,苏美矛盾的激化导致了联合国监督下的朝鲜选举只能在朝鲜南部举行,由此直接造成了朝鲜的分裂。朝鲜战争爆发后,由于苏联没有及时返回安理会,促使美国借用联合国的名义介入了朝鲜战争。志愿军入朝作战扭转战局以后,苏联拒绝了联合国的停火议案,错失了尽早实现朝鲜停战的一次机会。战争进入相持阶段后,苏美通过联合国渠道进行的沟通,推动了停战谈判大门的开启。战俘问题提交联合国以后,苏联始终坚持全部遣返的原则,致使联合国在战俘问题上无所作为。研究表明,苏美在联合国框架下关于朝鲜问题的博弈更多地表现为“零和”,较少表现为“双赢”。这种大体上多为“零和”的博弈,对朝鲜战争的升级和朝鲜停战的实现产生了重要影响。

关键词: 苏联, 美国, 朝鲜战争, 联合国

Abstract: In the early period after World War Ⅱ, the Korean election under the UN inspection had to be held only in southern Korea due to the confrontation of the Soviet-American relations, which caused the separation of Korea into two parts. After the outbreak of the Korean War, the U.S. promptly intervened in the war in the name of the UN under the condition that the Soviet Union hadn’t returned to the Security Council in time. With the early military success of Chinese Peoples’ Voluntary Army, the Soviet Union rejected to accept the UN ceasefire suggestion, which led to the missing of a chance to end the War as early as possible. When the War came into a deadlock, the communication between the Soviet Union and the US through the UN channel promoted to open the door of the armistice negotiations. After the issue of prisoners of war (POW) was submitted into the UN, the Soviet’s adherence to the principle that all POWs should be repatriated unconditionally made the UN reach no conclusion. In short, the Soviet-American game on the Korean issue in the UN framework often results in a zero-sum rather than a win-win situation, which has had an important impact on the intensification of the Korean War and the delay of the armistice negotiations.