华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6): 32-43.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2021.06.004

• 哲学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

实践哲学与实践理论

郑永流, 陈鲁夏   

  • 出版日期:2021-11-15 发布日期:2021-11-25
  • 作者简介:郑永流,中国政法大学中欧法学院教授(北京:102249)|陈鲁夏,中国政法大学中欧法学院博士研究生

Philosophy of Practice and Theory of Practices

Yong-liu ZHENG, Lu-xia CHEN   

  • Online:2021-11-15 Published:2021-11-25

摘要:

虽然实践哲学和实践理论都共享着“实践”一词,但是学界鲜有系统探究两者关系之作。西方不存在一个统一的实践哲学,实践哲学在黑格尔之后出现了传统与现代之分。在对于实践要素的理解上,现代实践哲学表现出与亚里士多德实践哲学的亲缘性。实践理论直接继承并发展着现代实践哲学,而其与传统实践哲学的关系则是间接的、以现代实践哲学为中介发生的。实践理论在基本哲学立场、二元论问题、实践规范性以及实践之未来维度等方面将现代实践哲学的基本立场拓展到社会学、人类学、文化理论、语言学、科学哲学,甚至女性主义、组织研究、消费研究等领域中,从而为理解各种鲜活的社会生活提供了具体学科式的说明。现代实践哲学与实践理论在未来也许会融为一体。

关键词: 实践哲学, 实践理论, 形而上学, 交叉学科

Abstract:

Although both philosophy of practice and theory of practices share the concept “practice”, there are few works that systematically explore the relationship between these two traditions. There is no unified tradition of practical philosophy in the West, and after Hegel, there is a division between traditional and modern practical philosophy. In terms of understanding the elements of practice, modern practical philosophy shows its affinity with Aristotle. Theory of practices directly inherits and develops modern practical philosophy, while its relationship with traditional practical philosophy is indirect and mediated by modern practical philosophy. Theory of practices develops the basic claims of modern practical philosophy in terms of fundamental philosophical positions, dualism, practical normativity, and future dimensions of practice into various fields such as sociology, anthropology, cultural theory, linguistics, philosophy of science, and even feminism, organizational studies, and consumption studies, thus providing a discipline-specific account for understanding various aspects of vivid social life. Modern practical philosophy and theory of practices may be unified in the future.

Key words: philosophy of practice, theory of practices, metaphysic, interdisciplinary discipline