华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 60-69.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2025.04.005

• 马克思主义与现时代 • 上一篇    下一篇

1866年危机笔记与马克思的虚拟资本理论探赜

代利刚   

  • 接受日期:2025-06-20 出版日期:2025-07-15 发布日期:2025-07-31
  • 作者简介:代利刚,江南大学马克思主义学院教授(无锡,214122)
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金一般项目“当代国外新黑格尔式马克思主义批判研究”(项目编号:21BZX031)。

Notes on 1866 Crisis and Marx’s Theory of Fictitious Capital

Ligang Dai   

  • Accepted:2025-06-20 Online:2025-07-15 Published:2025-07-31

摘要:

马克思的虚拟资本理论因关涉对金融资本主义的批判而成为当代重要学术议题。斯威齐继承希法亭关于金融资本的研究,采用“连续渐进方法”诠释虚拟资本和实际资本的分离机制,但忽视了虚拟资本形成的过程性及其自身体系性特征。当代新黑格尔式马克思主义将虚拟资本定义为对“未来收入流”的索取权与真正的“非存在”,给出了更具黑格尔体系辩证法意味的诠释,与传统的解读方式形成对峙。为解决虚拟资本诠释难题,需要回到MEGA Ⅱ文本,探赜大量论及虚拟资本的马克思1866年危机笔记。通过危机透视方法,深入理解虚拟资本的实质与运行机制,为驾驭“金融资本”提供一种更具“中庸”和辩证的理路。

关键词: 马克思, 虚拟资本, 金融资本, 经济危机, 《资本论》

Abstract:

Marx’s theory of fictitious capital has become a crucial contemporary academic topic due to its critical value in analyzing financial capitalism. Inheriting Hilferding’s research on finance capital, Sweezy adopted a “continuous progressive method” to interpret the separation mechanism between fictitious and real capital. However, he overlooked the procedure of fictitious capital formation and its inherent systemic characteristics. Contemporary Neo-Hegelian Marxism defines fictitious capital as a claim on “future income streams” and a truly “non-existent” entity, offering an interpretation more imbued with Hegelian systematic dialectics while opposite to traditional readings. To address the interpretive challenges of fictitious capital, it is necessary to return to the MEGA II texts and explore Marx’s extensive notes on 1866 crisis concerning fictitious capital. Through a crisis-based perspective, a deeper understanding of the essence and operational mechanisms of fictitious capital can be achieved and a more “moderate” and dialectical approach to navigating “finance capital” can be discovered.

Key words: Marx, fictitious capital, financial capital, dialectics of value form, Das Kapital