华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2006, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 15-22.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2006.06.003

• 现代性研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

真理、偶然性与现代性

韦尔默阿尔布莱希特, 应奇   

  • 收稿日期:2006-07-20 出版日期:2006-11-15 发布日期:2006-11-30
  • 作者简介:阿尔布莱希特·韦尔默(1933-)，男，曾任德国康斯坦茨大学和柏林自由大学教授|应奇(1967-)，男，杭州人，浙江大学哲学系教授

Truth, Contingency and Modernity

Albrecht Wellmer, Qi YING   

  • Received:2006-07-20 Online:2006-11-15 Published:2006-11-30

RichHTML

6

被引次数

8

摘要：

如果将真理的绝对主义与相对主义之吊诡称作“真理的二律背反”, 那么近数十年来, 许多哲学问题都是为了解决这个二律背反。希拉里·普特南、卡尔-奥托·阿佩尔、尤尔根·哈贝马斯似乎试图表明真理的绝对主义不必导致形而上学, 而理查德·罗蒂则试图表明对真理的绝对主义的批判不必导致相对主义。通过对上述两方围绕真理问题论争之理论基础的分析, 可以看到真理、偶然性与现代性之间的内在关联。

关键词: 真理, 绝对主义, 相对主义, 偶然性, 现代性

Abstract:

If the peculiar relationship between truth's absolutism and relativism can be called "truth's antinomy, " many philosophical issues over recent several decades of years aim at solving this antinomy. Hilary Putnam, Karl-Otto Apel and Jurgen Habermas all seem to say that absolutism of truth does not necessarily lead to metaphysics, whereas Richard Rorty attempts to say that criticisms of truth's absolutism do not necessarily result in relativism. Through an analysis of the above-mentioned two parties' debates on truth, those inherent relations among truth, contingency and modernity can be observed.

Key words: truth, absolutism, relativism, contingency, modernity

中图分类号: