华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (4): 52-62.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2026.04.006

• 文学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

事件≠在场:深描文学研究的伦理转向

刘阳   

  • 出版日期:2026-07-15 发布日期:2026-08-03
  • 作者简介:刘阳,华东师范大学中文系教授(上海,200241)
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金一般项目“当代文论关键词‘事件’的中国进路研究”(项目编号:24BZW012)。

Event ≠ Being Present:A Thick Description of the Ethical Turn in Literary Studies

Yang Liu   

  • Online:2026-07-15 Published:2026-08-03

摘要:

事件表面形似在场,实质不同于在场。两者的根本区别在于,在场经由声音造成的真理幻觉及形而上学自恋结构,将事件在重复与差异意义上形成的原初性、意外性、独异性与虚空性,置换成个体意义上对事件的消解。事件由此变在场的时间性为“空时间性”,不再沦入形而上学。基于这种区别,文学虽一直以在场为表象,但其实质并非一般所说的即解构理论所揭露的、所指意义迅速滑入能指场面的在场,而是阻断了在场直接性与透明性的事件,事件而非在场才是谈论文学的正确坐标。这种区别因而深描出了文学研究的伦理转向,提供了理解文学行动的新角度。

关键词: 事件, 在场, 他者, 伦理转向

Abstract:

In spite of their similarities in the first glance, the event is essentially different from being present. The fundamental difference lies in that being present, through the truth illusion caused by sounds, as well as its metaphysical narcissistic structure, replaces the event’s originality, contingency, singularity and voidness formed in the repetitive and differential senses, with the dissolution of the event in an individual sense. Thus, the event transforms the temporal nature of being present into an empty temporal nature, without falling into metaphysics any more. According to this distinction, literature, despite of its appearance of being present, is essentially not present in the ordinary sense, as revealed by deconstruction theory, that the meaning as the signified rapidly slips into the scene as the signifier. Instead, literature is the event blocking the directness and transparency of being present. It is not being present but the event that is the correct coordinate for discussing literature. With its thick description of the ethical turn in literary studies, this distinction provides a new perspective for understanding literary actions.

Key words: event, being present, the other, ethical turn