华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2006, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 23-29, 37.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2006.02.004

• “批判佛教”之批判 • 上一篇    下一篇

审查“批判佛教”的两条可能进路——兼谈中国佛教“人本主义”的判教思想

陈坚   

  1. 山东大学犹太教与跨宗教 研究中心，济南 250100
  • 收稿日期:2005-11-08 出版日期:2006-03-30 发布日期:2006-03-30
  • 作者简介:陈坚(1966——)，男，浙江宁海县人，山东大学犹太教与跨宗教研究中心研究员，博士

Two Possible Channels to Investigate "Critical Buddhism"

Jian CHEN   

  1. The Center for the Study of Judaism and Cross-religions, Shandong Uniwerity, Jinan 2510100, China
  • Received:2005-11-08 Online:2006-03-30 Published:2006-03-30

RichHTML

4

摘要：

日本当代的“批判佛教”思潮对佛教教义进行审查, 提出了“如来藏思想不是佛教”和“本觉思想不是佛教”两大议题。对这两大议题进行反审查的可能进路是: 一是审查“批判佛教”将“缘起论”设为佛教的“基本教义”, 然后以此为“佛教标准”来判断“如来藏思想”和“本觉思想”不是佛教是否恰当?二是退一步, 权且承认“批判佛教”将“缘起论”设为“佛教标准”是正确的, 然后在这个大前提下来审查“如来藏思想”和“本觉思想”是否违背了“缘起论”, 是否是佛教?审查的结论是: 无论在哪一条进路上, “批判佛教”的两大议题“如来藏思想不是佛教”和“本觉思想不是佛教”都是不能成立的。

关键词: 批判佛教, 如来藏, 本觉, 中国佛教, 判教

Abstract:

Critical Buddhism in modern Japan has investigated Buddhist doctrines, putting forward two propositions, one is that Tathāgata-garbha is not Buddhism, another inner-Buddha is not Buddhism.This article conversely investigates above two propositions from two possible channels, one is that how the theory of pratītya-samutpāda can be the criterion of Buddhism, the other whether Tathāgata-garbha and inner-Buddha run counter to the theory of pratītya-samutpāda when we admit the pratītya-samutpāda criterion for the time being.the result of the converse investigation finds that all the above two propositions of Critical Buddhism are mistaken.At last we compare the dogmatism in Critical Buddhism and the humanism in Chinese Buddhism.

Key words: critical Buddhism, Tathāgata-garbha, inner-Buddha (Original Enlightenment), Chinese Buddhism, the distinguishing and judging of the Buddhist classics

中图分类号: