华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (1): 46-56.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2021.01.006

• 国际冷战史 • 上一篇    下一篇

“导火索”:驻韩美军裁减问题与美韩关系(1948-1979)

梁志   

  • 出版日期:2021-01-15 发布日期:2021-01-27
  • 作者简介:梁志, 华东师范大学历史学系、社会主义历史与文献研究院教授(上海, 200241)

Flashpoint:The Issue of Reduction of U.S. Troops in South Korea and U.S.-ROK Relation(1948-1979)

Zhi LIANG   

  • Online:2021-01-15 Published:2021-01-27

摘要:

无论是冷战时期还是在后冷战时代,驻韩美军都是美韩同盟关系中最重要的议题之一。其中,最具争议的事项便是驻韩美军的削减。“二战”结束后的三十余年间,美韩两国在驻韩美军的裁减或撤出问题上屡次爆发争端甚至信任危机,该现象的背后隐藏着双方战略认知方式的差异:美国削减驻韩美军的决定或动议源自于华盛顿对全球、亚洲和朝鲜半岛事务的多重考量。与美国“由面至点”看待驻韩美军问题不同,韩国采用了“由点而面”的视角,认为驻韩美军的削减乃至撤离意味着美国对韩国安全承诺的下降以及在亚洲和全球反共决心的衰退。绝大多数情况下,青瓦台在驻韩美军削减或撤出议题上并无否决权,阻碍驻韩美军裁减的首要因素是华府内部各部门之间的不同立场。时至今日,战略认知方式相左与话语权不对称仍旧是美韩同盟关系的基本属性之一。

关键词: 冷战, 美韩同盟, 驻韩美军, 战略认知, 话语权

Abstract:

U.S. forces in South Korea is one of the most important issues for the U.S.-ROK alliance from the cold war period to the post-cold war era. The disarmament or withdrawal of U.S. forces in South Korea is most controversial. During over three decades after World War Ⅱ, this triggered many controversies or even crises of confidence. It reflects the difference of strategic perception between the U.S. and South Korea:the U.S. often decided or proposed to reduce or withdraw the troops from South Korea based on multilateral considerations for global, Asian, and Korean Peninsula affairs; on the contrary, South Korea frequently viewed this as the signs of the decline of U.S.' security commitment for South Korea or U.S.' anti-communist determination in Asia and even worldwide. South Korea had no power of veto for the reduction or withdrawal of U.S. forces in South Korea in most cases. The primary reason for the failure of U.S. forces reduction or withdrawal is the disputes among different departments in Washington. Until now, the difference of strategic perception and the asymmetry of discourse right is still one of the basic features of the U.S.-ROK alliance.

Key words: the cold war, U.S.-ROK alliance, U.S. forces in South Korea, strategic perception, discourse right