华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (5): 135-144.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2026.05.013

• 社会学研究 • 上一篇    

社会工作本土知识建构的文化比较路径

安秋玲   

  • 出版日期:2026-09-15 发布日期:2026-10-09
  • 作者简介:安秋玲,华东师范大学中国现代城市研究中心暨社会发展学院教授,上海市“中国特色的转型社会学研究”社会科学创新研究基地研究员(上海,200241)
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“基于干预实践的我国社会工作本土知识建构研究”(项目编号:23YJA840001)。

A Cross-Cultural Approach to the Construction of Indigenous Social-Work Knowledge

Qiuling An   

  • Online:2026-09-15 Published:2026-10-09

摘要:

建构社会工作自主知识体系是中国社会工作学科发展的关键命题。为此,基于文化自觉的学术立场,突破传统本土知识生产的“内置型”研究范式,提出通过文化比较路径建构社会工作本土知识体系的理论思路。首先系统阐释社会工作知识形态的文化建构本质,揭示其文化实践属性与知识生产逻辑的深层关联,为文化比较研究奠定理论基础。其次,批判性分析既有本土化研究路径的局限,论证文化比较方法在知识生产中的独特价值:通过异文化参照系的建立,既能够激活本土实践场域中的隐性知识要素,又可通过系统化的比较框架强化知识生产主体性,最终实现本土知识体系建构的范式创新。最后,以老年社会工作领域为例,分析文化比较方法在知识建构中的具体操作,展现其突破“中西二元论”思维定式、实现全球普遍性与地方特殊性辩证统一的方法论优势。这一探索性研究,不仅为社会工作知识生产提供了“外悬式”比较视角,更通过形成“文化间性”的对话机制,为中国特色社会工作知识体系的建构开辟了新的可能。

关键词: 社会工作, 本土知识, 跨文化比较, 知识建构

Abstract:

Constructing an autonomous knowledge system of social work is a key issue in the development of the discipline in China. From a scholarly standpoint grounded in cultural self-awareness, this article moves beyond the inward-looking research paradigm of conventional indigenous knowledge production and proposes the construction of an indigenous social-work knowledge system through cultural comparison. First, it systematically explains the culturally constituted nature of social-work knowledge and reveals the deep connection between its character as cultural practice and the logic of knowledge production, thereby laying a theoretical foundation for cross-cultural comparative research. Second, through a critical analysis of the limitations of existing indigenization approaches, it demonstrates the distinctive value of cultural comparison in knowledge production. Establishing cross-cultural frames of reference can both activate tacit knowledge elements within local practice fields and reconstruct the agency of knowledge producers through a systematic comparative framework, ultimately enabling paradigmatic innovation in the indigenous knowledge system. Taking gerontological social work as an example, this article analyzes how cultural comparison can operate in knowledge construction and demonstrates its methodological advantages in breaking through the entrenched East-West dichotomy and achieving a dialectical unity of global universality and local particularity. This exploratory study not only provides an externally anchored comparative perspective for social-work knowledge production but also opens new possibilities for constructing a theoretical system of social work with Chinese characteristics by establishing a mechanism of intercultural dialogue.

Key words: social work, indigenous knowledge, cross-cultural comparison, knowledge construction