华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2013, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 98-105.

• 中国近代史研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

科耶夫与中国 
——对科耶夫《评梁启超〈先秦法的概念与法家理论〉》的解读

肖 琦   

  1. 华东师范大学哲学系/巴黎一大历史系,上海,200241
  • 出版日期:2013-09-15 发布日期:2013-11-06
  • 通讯作者: 肖 琦
  • 作者简介:肖 琦

Kojève and China: An Interpretation of Kojève’s Comments on Liang Qichao’s The Concept of Law and the Theories of in the Pre-Qin Period

XIAO Qi   

  • Online:2013-09-15 Published:2013-11-06
  • Contact: XIAO Qi
  • About author:XIAO Qi

摘要: 亚历山大·科耶夫未刊印手稿中有一篇写于1927年的书评。在这篇作品中,科耶夫对梁启超在《先秦政治思想史》中所指出的法家思想与西方的法的观念的相似点给予了否定,认为法家思想与儒家思想的关系只不过是实践政治学与理论哲学的关系,中国与西方完全属于两个不同的世界。其实,科耶夫对中国文化特殊性的这一思考,更深层次的原因来自于他对祖国———1920年代俄罗斯的发展道路的特殊性的思考。在文化的普适性与特殊性的反思中,中国文化无疑成了俄罗斯特殊发展道路的最有力的辩护。有意思的是,科耶夫的思想发展经历了从东方到西方再到东方的转变,而这些转变始终都伴随着他对中国或者说东方世界的关注。

关键词: 科耶夫, 中国, 梁启超, 普适性, 特殊性

Abstract: This paper tries to interpret Alexandria Kojève’s view of China according to his unpublished book review written in 1927. In this review, Kojève denies Liang Qichao’s idea expressed in his History of Political Thought in the Pre-Qin Period that legalism is similar to Western theories of law. Kojève believes that the relation between Legalism and the Confucianism is merely that between a practical politics and a theoretical philosophy, and China and the Western world belong to two completely different worlds. In fact, the deeper reasons of Kojève’s belief of the particularity of Chinese culture can be found in his consideration of the particularity of the Russian road of development in 1920s. In his reflection on cultural universality and cultural particularity, Chinese culture obviously becomes a strong defense for the particular road in Russia. What’s interesting is that in all his life, Kojève has experienced intellectual transformation from the East to the West and again to the East, which is always accompanied by an attention to China or the East.

Key words: Kojè, ve, China, Liang Qichao, universality, particularity