华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (3): 62-73.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2025.03.007

• 文学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

见证·认同·感召:现象学文学批评“回到作品本身”的三种理路

张永清   

  • 接受日期:2025-04-26 出版日期:2025-05-15 发布日期:2025-05-28
  • 作者简介:张永清,中国人民大学文学院教授(北京,100872)
  • 基金资助:
    中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目“结构主义的读者理论——从罗兰·巴特到乔纳森·卡勒”(项目编号:19XNQ031)。

Witnessing,Recognition,Appeal:Three Approaches to “Returning to the Work Itself” in Phenomenological Literary Criticism

Yongqing Zhang   

  • Accepted:2025-04-26 Online:2025-05-15 Published:2025-05-28

摘要:

“ 回到作品本身 ”是胡塞尔—英伽登意义上的现象学文学批评的共同理论诉求。在胡塞尔的意向性理论、英伽登的作品论等影响下,现象学文学批评形成了三种理论路径:第一种是杜夫海纳的“见证”批评,认为作品的意义由作品的感性形式所决定,批评是对作品意义的解蔽而非创造;第二种是布莱的“认同”批评 , 认为批评就是对作品之中作者“我思”的认同,认同是对作品意义的亲历而非创造;第三种是伊瑟尔的“感召”批评,认为批评对文学本文的感知并非对其被动记录,而是情感得以激发、想象力得以激活的过程,感召是对作品意义的创造,尽管这种创造受文学本文等结构性因素的制约。

关键词: 现象学, 文学批评, 见证, 认同, 感召

Abstract:

“Returning to the work itself” is the shared theoretical pursuit of phenomenological literary criticism in the sense of Husserl and Ingarden. Under the influence of Husserl’s theory of intentionality and Ingarden’s theory of literary works, phenomenological literary criticism has developed three theoretical approaches. The first is Mikel Dufrenne’s “witnessing” criticism, which believes that the meaning of a work is determined by its perceptual form, and criticism is unveiling rather than creating the meaning of the work. The second is Georges Poulet’s “recognition” criticism, which holds that criticism is the recognition of the author’s “cogito” in the work. The third is Wolfgang Iser’s “appeal” criticism, which claims that the critic’s perception of literary texts is not a passive recording of the work but presents a process in which affections are aroused, and the imagination is activated. In the process of appealing, the reader participates in meaning creation surrounding the work, albeit constrained by structural factors such as the literary text itself.

Key words: phenomenology, literary criticism, witnessing, recognition, appeal