Three Types of Universalism in International Politics——A Comparison of Rawls' and Habermas' International Theories after the Iraq War

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2003.06.001

Abstract

Abstract:

Three are some parallels between Jurgen Habermas' recent criticisms at the notion of "liberal nationalism" in the context of the U. S. global strategy and at John Rawls' basic theoretical design of justice. Does this mean that Rawls' position of international issues is close to liberal nationalism or that Habermas' criticism of Rawls is ill founded, at least not fits to Rawls' international political theory? This paper gives a negative answer to the both questions, and argues that the reason lies in that Rawls's political theory as a kind of "universalism of virtual dialogue" intermediates between liberal nationalistic "monologic universalism" and Habermas' "dialogic universalism".

Key words: universalism, unilateralism, liberalism, discourse theory, Rawls, Habermas

CLC Number:

K1
D091

Shi-jun TONG. Three Types of Universalism in International Politics——A Comparison of Rawls' and Habermas' International Theories after the Iraq War[J]. J. East China Norm. Univ. Philos. Soc. Sci, 2003, 35(6): 1-11, 118.

References 9

1	Samuel P. Huntington: "American Ideals versus American Institutions", Political Science Quarterly, Volume 97, Number Ⅰ, Spring 1982.
2	Samuel P. Huntington: "The West unique, not universal", Foreign Affairs, Nov/Dec96, Vol. 75 Issue 6.
3	Jürgen Habermas: "Was bedeutet der Denkmalsturz?", Frankfurter Allgemeinan Zeitung Vom 17, April 2003.
4	康德, (何兆武译). 历史理性批判文集[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1991.
5	Jürgen Habermas: "Letter to America", Nation; 12116/2002, Vol 275 Issue 21.
6	尤尔根·哈贝马斯, (曹卫东译). 包容他者[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2002.
7	Richard Rorty: "Demiitigung oder Solidaritt".
8	哈贝马斯, (童世骏译). 在事实与规范之间[M]. 上海: 三联书店, 2003.
9	Jürgen Habermas: "Bestialitt und Hurnanitt: Ein Krieg an der Grenze zwischen. Recht und Moral", in Die Zeit, No. 18, 1999.

[1]	Chenjie Chen. Exploring Xunzi’s Ethics of Argumentation from the Perspective of “Discourse” [J]. J. East China Norm. Univ. Philos. Soc. Sci, 2025, 57(2): 70-77.
[2]	Yongjie Chen. Communicative Subject Detached from Perceptual Activities：On Habermas’ Misinterpretation of Marx’s Concept of Subject [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2024, 56(6): 1-10.
[3]	Bourke Richard. History and Normativity in Political Theory: The Case of Rawls [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 1-13.
[4]	LIU Jing-xi. Mutual Learning of Chinese and Western Cultures and the Construction of “a Community of Shared Future for Mankind”: From the Perspective of Political Ecology [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 19-29.
[5]	TANG Yong-hua. Literature in the Face of Cruelty: From Shklar to Rorty [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph, 2019, 51(3): 80-91.
[6]	WANG Jin-Yu. God and Justice: The Issue of Religion in Rawls’ Political Philosophy [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph, 2016, 48(2): 82-88.
[7]	Michael Freeden. The Political Unreality of Political Realism [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph, 2014, 46(3): 1-06.
[8]	CAI Zhi-dong. Three Kinds of Discourse of Daoist Liberalism [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph, 2013, 45(3): 67-73.
[9]	WANG Tao-Yang. Basic Environmental Goods and Rawls’ “Primary Goods” [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph, 2012, 44(6): 52-58.
[10]	ZHU Jing. Reflection and Transcendence ----A Review of Studies on Radicalism [J]. J. East China Norm. Univ. Philos. Soc. Sci, 2011, 43(4): 141-151.
[11]	YAO Da-zhi. John Rawls and Social Minimum [J]. J. East China Norm. Univ. Philos. Soc. Sci, 2011, 43(3): 22-27.
[12]	ZHANG Qing. The Emergence of Liberalism in China and Its Significance in the Period of after World War II [J]. J. East China Norm. Univ. Philos. Soc. Sci, 2011, 43(2): 37-47.
[13]	Zheng-yong WU, Ru-zhuang XU. Habermas' Exploration of the Relationship between Modernity and Rationality [J]. J. East China Norm. Univ. Philos. Soc. Sci, 2006, 38(6): 23-28.
[14]	Jian-hua ZHANG. P.B.Struve's Central Idea of Liberalism [J]. J. East China Norm. Univ. Philos. Soc. Sci, 2006, 38(1): 34-40.
[15]	Bao-wei ZHOU. The "Liberal" Liberty and the "Republican"Liberty——The Intellectual Conflict in Scottish Enlightenment [J]. J. East China Norm. Univ. Philos. Soc. Sci, 2006, 38(1): 8-14.