Significance of the Methodology of Daoism Today: The Construction of Modern Chinese Philosophy

Abstract

Abstract:

To construct modern Chinese philosophy with its own national feature, it is necessary for us to explore particular methodologies in ancient Chinese philosophy and then transform them in a creative way. Characterized by an effort to reach a synthesis of attributions on different levels, the methodology of Daoism provides us a possibility to achieve the fusion of Chinese and Western thoughts so as to construct modern Chinese philosophy with its own national feature.

Key words: construction of philosophy, Methodology of Daoism, modern significance

CLC Number:

Zu-zhao GU. Significance of the Methodology of Daoism Today: The Construction of Modern Chinese Philosophy[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2007, 39(6): 63-70.

	恩格斯 1970, 反杜林论. 北京: 人民出版社.
	闵家胤 1999, 进化的多元论———系统哲学的新体系. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社.
	列宁 1957, 哲学笔记. 北京: 人民出版社.
	庞朴 2003, 一分为三论. 上海: 上海古籍出版社.
	郭沫若. 周易时代的社会生活[A]. 中国古代社会研究[C]. 上海: 科学出版社, 1964.
	任继愈 1985, 老子新译. 上海: 上海古籍出版社.
	黑格尔 1979, 哲学史讲演录. 北京: 商务印书馆, 第一卷

[1]	Zhi-dong CAI. To be a Sage by learning from common people: On the Way to Achieve Dao in ZHANG Xue-cheng [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2007, 39(6): 58-62, 90.
[2]	Guo-bao JIANG. On ZHANG Xue-cheng's Doctrine that Six Classics are History [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2007, 39(6): 52-57.
[3]	. A Written Conversation about Zhang Xue—cheng's Thought and Scholarship [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 1-1,25.
[4]	Liang-jian LIU. Ji: A Key Category in Wang Chuan-shan's Philosophy [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 29-33.
[5]	Hong-wei LI. The Union of Knowing and Doing and Free Will [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 25-28,41.
[6]	Pi-xian LI. The Logical Access and Theoretical Trait of FENG Qi's Aesthetics——A Concurrent Comparison with Practical Aesthetics [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2007, 39(2): 15-19.
[7]	Zhao-guo DAI. The Methodology for Interpretations of Traditional Chinese Philosophical Classics——A Focus on the Interpretation of the Text of the Great Learning [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2006, 38(6): 9-14.
[8]	Cun-shan LI. A Beginning from the People-first Idea toward Democracy——A Concurrent Comment on"the People-first Limit" [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2006, 38(6): 1-8, 55.
[9]	Lan-fen LI. The Charm and Puzzle of Mysterious Speculation——A Reconsideration of Wang Bi's Metaphysical Learning [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2006, 38(5): 51-55.
[10]	Hong-liang GU. The Dimension of the Philosophy of Other in Confucius' Doctrine [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2006, 38(5): 46-50.
[11]	Zhang-zhen FU. A Tentative Study on ZHU Xi's Dual Personality [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2006, 38(4): 63-68.
[12]	Gen-you WU. On the Internal Causes of the Emergence of the Philosophical Problematics in Modern Chinese Philosophy [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2006, 38(3): 4-9.
[13]	Jia-ming CHEN. On the Issues Essential to the Interpretive Framework of China's Modernity [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2006, 38(3): 1-3, 48.
[14]	De-lin MA. Art: Reality as Indeal——On Feng Qi's Aesthetics and Its Relevance to the Contemporary Discussions [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2006, 38(2): 51-55, 71.
[15]	Wei-wu LI. On the Methodological Significance of Feng Qi's Researching into the History of Chinese Modern Philosophy [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2006, 38(2): 45-50.

Significance of the Methodology of Daoism Today: The Construction of Modern Chinese Philosophy

RichHTML

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 0

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments