华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (5): 11-28.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2025.05.002

• 哲学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

我之无我:《仁学》 钩沉

高瑞泉   

  • 接受日期:2025-09-04 出版日期:2025-09-15 发布日期:2025-10-09
  • 作者简介:高瑞泉,华东师范大学哲学系暨中国现代思想文化研究所教授(上海,200241)
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“中国近代价值观念史”(项目编号:18ZDA020)。

The Selflessness of the Self:Rediscovering The Insights of Tan Sitong’s Treatise of Ren

Ruiquan Gao   

  • Accepted:2025-09-04 Online:2025-09-15 Published:2025-10-09

摘要:

谭嗣同的遗著《仁学》 虽是近代哲学名著却未经充分研究。他追随儒家仁学传统,因应巨变时代的关切,以“通”释“仁”。透过玄理与日常、伦理与新知杂糅的外表,我们可以勾勒出“仁-通”哲学的大纲,分析其道论、社会哲学和心身哲学等诸项义理:“仁以通为第一义”,包括中外通、上下通、男女通和人我通,中心是“人我通”。其社会哲学持激进的平等主义取向,为指向“人我通”的自我观念提供了强辩护。通之具虽可有诸般形容,最后胜出者归于“心力”。“心力”既是社会改革的动力之源,亦将促成心灵或精神世界的“通”,抵达普遍圆融的理想境界。从古典的自我观念出发,“通”的哲学旨在“别开一种冲决网罗之学”,故必须破“塞”且嵌进“权利”等现代性要素,因而折入和导引着“人的解放”潮流。谭嗣同依然属于这样的哲学家:“继续不断地把自己修养到进于无我的纯粹境界,从而与宇宙合二为一。”积极救世取代静观冥想成为修养之道,融入科学新知的宇宙论、传统儒道学说和佛教智慧,组织起多重论述,从实践和理论两方面消弭“我”与“无我”的紧张。“我之无我”展开为激进的社会改革蓝图和古典的人格理想,亦可视为“谭嗣同之死”的一种哲学叙事。

关键词: 谭嗣同, 仁学, 通, 人我通, 我, 无我

Abstract:

Tan Sitong’s posthumous work Doctrine of Ren (Renxue) is a renowned yet insufficiently studied masterpiece of modern philosophy. Rooted in the Confucian tradition of ren (humanity), it responds to the urgent concerns of an era of upheaval by interpreting ren through the lens of “thoroughgoingness” (tong). Beneath its surface blended of mysticism, ethics, common sense and new knowledge, we can outline the framework of a “ren-throughgoingness” philosophy and examine its doctrines of the dao, social theory, and mind-body philosophy. For Tang, “ren takes thoroughgoingness as its primary meaning”. Taking that of the self and the other as its core, thoroughgoingness also encompasses that between China and the West, the superior and the inferior, and female and male. Its social philosophy advocates radical egalitarianism, providing robust justification for the concept of the self orienting toward the thoroughgoingness of the self and the other. As for the means of achieving throughgoingness, its best expression is “mind/heart-force”, which serves as both the impetus of social reform and the driver of spiritual “throughgoingness”, leading to a universally harmonious ideal. Departing from the classical concept of the self, Tan’s philosophy of “throughgoinness” aims to “forge a new learning that can break through all nets”. It thus must dismantle “blockages” and integrate modernity elements like “rights” so as to channel the tide of “human liberation”. Tan remains a philosopher who “continually cultivates himself toward the purity of selfless in a unity with the cosmos”. Nevertheless, in Tan, active salvation has replaced contemplative meditation as the path of cultivation. A cosmology enriched by new scientific knowledge, traditional doctrines of Confucianism and Daoism, and Buddhist wisdom - all of these are woven into multilayered discourses that try to dissolve the tension between the “self” and the “selflessness” in both theory and practice. “The selflessness of the self” unfolds as a blueprint for radical social reform and a classical ideal of personality, which also offers a philosophical narrative for “Tan Sitong’s death”.

Key words: Tan Sitong, Treatise of Ren, thoroughgoingness, thoroughgoingness between the self and the other, self, selflessness