华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (5): 99-111.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2026.05.010

• 意象研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

朱光潜“意象”范畴的跨文化释译与中国现代美学建构

黄立   

  • 出版日期:2026-09-15 发布日期:2026-10-09
  • 作者简介:黄立,上海师范大学外国语学院教授(上海,200235)
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“审美意象的历史发展及其理论建构研究”(项目编号:21ZD067)。

Zhu Guangqian’s Cross-Cultural Interpretive Translation of Yixiang and the Construction of Modern Chinese Aesthetics

Li Huang   

  • Online:2026-09-15 Published:2026-10-09

摘要:

以朱光潜“意象”范畴的跨文化释译与现代美学建构为研究对象,可以考察其如何立足本土“意象”诗学资源,对康德 Idee、克罗齐intuition (intuizione)与 image (immagine)、黑格尔 Bild、叔本华 Vorstellung 等分属不同理论传统的西方美学概念进行释译与整合。朱光潜的“意象”释译突破了术语对等的直译范式,是以本土传统范畴为理论支点的跨文化知识重构。通过“本土范畴统摄—异质概念重组—现代体系建构”的释译机制,朱光潜将源于不同理论传统的西学资源统合于“意象”阐释框架之内,推动“意象”由传统诗学中的经验性审美概念,转型为贯通审美生成、艺术创造与形式建构的现代美学核心范畴。这一跨文化释译实践表明,中国现代美学并非西方美学的简单移植,而是在中西文化的双向互释中推动传统范畴的现代转换,并逐步建构起具有本土特色的现代美学理论体系。

关键词: 朱光潜, 意象, 跨文化释译, 范畴生成, 中国现代美学

Abstract:

This article examines Zhu Guangqian’s cross-cultural interpretive translation of yixiang and its role in constructing modern Chinese aesthetics. Drawing on the indigenous resources of traditional yixiang poetics, Zhu interpreted and integrated Western aesthetic concepts from distinct theoretical traditions, including Kant’s Idee, Croce’s intuizione (intuition) and immagine (image), Hegel’s Bild, and Schopenhauer’s Vorstellung. Zhu’s interpretive translation of yixiang transcends a model of literal terminological equivalence and constitutes a cross-cultural reconstruction of knowledge grounded in an indigenous traditional category. Adopting an interpretive translation mechanism of “subsuming heterogeneous concepts under an indigenous category, reorganizing disparate concepts, and constructing a modern theoretical system, ” Zhu incorporated Western intellectual resources from diverse traditions into an interpretive framework centered on yixiang. He thereby transformed yixiang from an experiential aesthetic concept in traditional Chinese poetics into a core category of modern aesthetics that integrates aesthetic genesis, artistic creation, and formal construction. This cross-cultural practice of interpretive translation demonstrates that modern Chinese aesthetics is not a simplistic transplantation of Western aesthetic thought. Rather, through the reciprocal interpretation of Chinese and Western cultures, traditional aesthetic categories achieve modern transformation and a modern aesthetic system with distinctive indigenous characteristics gradually takes shape.

Key words: Zhu Guangqian, yixiang, cross-cultural interpretive translation, formation of categories, modern Chinese aesthetics