华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (6): 1-10.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2024.06.001

• 马克思主义与现时代 •    下一篇

脱离感性活动的交往主体——论哈贝马斯对马克思主体概念的解读

陈永杰   

  • 接受日期:2024-10-23 出版日期:2024-11-15 发布日期:2024-12-02
  • 作者简介:陈永杰,江南大学马克思主义学院教授(无锡,214122)
  • 基金资助:
    江苏高校哲学社会科学研究重大项目“习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想对唯物史观的原创性贡献研究”(项目编号:2023SJZD076)。

Communicative Subject Detached from Perceptual Activities:On Habermas’ Misinterpretation of Marx’s Concept of Subject

Yongjie Chen   

  • Accepted:2024-10-23 Online:2024-11-15 Published:2024-12-02

摘要:

哈贝马斯为实现历史唯物主义全面解释社会进化的目标,重新阐释了唯物史观及其基本范畴,尝试以交往行为理论克服思辨哲学的理论范式,为把握当代资本主义社会提供了新的视角。哈贝马斯的批判理论展现出了其在当代境遇中重建历史唯物主义的理论建树,但他通过语言建构的理想交往模式并没有深入到社会存在领域。由于未能彻底从意识内在性的思维范式中抽身,哈贝马斯误判马克思的主体概念仍旧属于认知主体的范畴。他不曾洞见主体概念只能由感性活动来定向——主体在感性活动中的自我生成,也无法领会主体的解放正是通过感性活动才得以实现。因此,哈贝马斯在解读马克思的主体概念时,构建的交往主体概念仍然局限于意识领域,未能触及社会现实。

关键词: 哈贝马斯, 主体, 感性活动, 意识内在性

Abstract:

To enhance its theoretical capacity to explain social evolution, Jurgen Habermas reinterprets historical materialism as well as its basic categories. He attempts to overcome the theoretical paradigm of speculative philosophy with his theory of communicative action, and thus provide a new perspective for grasping contemporary capitalist society. Although his critical theory shows some theoretical achievements in reconstructing historical materialism in the contemporary context, Habermas’ ideal communication mode constructed by language fails to go deep enough into the field of social being. Habermas misjudges that Marx’s concept of subject is still confined within the scope of cognitive subject because he could not completely move out the thinking paradigm of the immanence of consciousness. Moreover, neither does he understand that the subject can only be directed by perceptual activities, that is, the self-generation of the subject in perceptual activities, nor does he comprehend that it is through perceptual activities that the liberation of the subject can be realized. Therefore, Habermas’ concept of communicative subject constructed in his interpretation of Marx is still limited in the domain of consciousness and consequently fails to touch social reality.

Key words: Habermas, subject, perceptual activity, immanence of consciousness