华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2007, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 21-30, 37.

• 现代性研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

从正当性到证成性: 一个未完成的范式转换

周濂   

  1. 中国人民大学 哲学系,北京 100872
  • 收稿日期:2007-09-28 出版日期:2007-12-15 发布日期:2007-12-15
  • 作者简介:周濂(1974——),男,浙江人,中国人民大学哲学院讲师,博士

From Legitimacy to Justification: An Unfinished Paradigm Shift

Lian ZHOU   

  1. Department of Philosophy, People's Universiy of China, Beijng 100872, China
  • Received:2007-09-28 Online:2007-12-15 Published:2007-12-15

摘要:

西蒙斯与罗尔斯之间的差异究其根本是洛克主义与康德主义之别, 而当代英美政治哲学的主流之所以会混用正当性与证成性, 并倾向于把洛克主义的正当性转变为证成性, 是因为洛克主义的问题感和方法论被康德主义所取代的缘故, 但这是一种尚未完成的范式转换。

关键词: 正当性, 证成性, 正义, 公民资格, 成员资格

Abstract:

A. John Simmons has made a distinction between justification and legitimacy and condemned the confusion of them in John Rawls and some other philosophers. The article argues that the difference between Simmons and Rawls is in essence a difference between Lockism and Kantism. The change of key issue from legitimacy to justification in contemporary political philosophy indicates an unfinished paradigm shift from Lockism to Kantism.

Key words: legitimacy, justification, justice, citizenship, membership

中图分类号: