华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2011, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 16-21.

• 哲学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

论唐君毅的“宇宙唯心”说

胡岩   

  1. 华东师范大学哲学系，上海，200241
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-05-15 发布日期:2011-07-29
  • 通讯作者: 胡岩

On Tang Chun-i’s Theory of “Idealistic World”

Hu Yan   

  1. Department of Philosophy, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200241, China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2011-05-15 Published:2011-07-29
  • Contact: Hu Yan

RichHTML

21

被引次数

1

摘要： 唐君毅的自然观或者说自我与自然之关系的理论，是唐君毅哲学研究中被相对忽略的部分，但是却对理解唐君毅的唯心论相当重要。他的自然观可以展现为三个方面：在本体论上，肯定了自在之物的存在，却将化自在之物为为我之物的活动仅仅视为心灵的活动；在认识论上，将自然之秩序的来源主要归结于心灵的不同活动方式，把对自然的认识转化为对心灵之活动的认识；在价值论上，把价值的来源主要归结为自我的需要，并将自我理解为心灵。由此，唐君毅“宇宙唯心”的论式中所展开的理论在充分强调心灵之能动性的同时，却并未如实把握自我与自然的关系，也不能完整地认识理想自我之特征，从而在很大程度限制了真正符合时代要求的“理想的自我”的建构。

关键词: 唐君毅, 自我, 自然, 唯心论

Abstract: Tang Chun-i’s view of nature, i.e. a theory of the relation between self and nature, has been at least slightly neglected by researchers, but it is undoubtedly rather important to understand Tang’s idealism. Tang’s viewpoint about it contains three parts. Concerning ontologically, he holds there is a thing-in-itself, it can be transformed into humanized nature as mental activity; Epistemologically, the order of nature is mainly derived from the manners of mental activity, simultaneously he transfers the knowledge of nature into the knowledge of mind; In discussing the value theory, he reduces principally natural value to ego’s needs, and he also regards self as soul. Given mentioned above, Tang’s view on idealistic world emphasizes the role of mind too excessively, while he doesn’t grasp exactly the relation between self and nature .Therefore, Tang would not be aware of the character of ideal self completely. It confines, to a great extent, his constitution on self which would be conformed with the times.

Key words: Tang Chun-i, self, nature, idealism