区域研究中的话语、比较与反身性

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2020.04.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 作为一个跨学科的研究领域，在区域研究的生存和进一步发展中，有两个至关重要的问题：其一，每个团体的专家都应该专注于他们所做工作的话语性（discursive nature），而不能将其视为一种宇宙的自然状态；其二，他们必须相互交流。除非我们怀有一种自我批判和彻底比较的治学态度，否则区域研究很难蓬勃发展。

关键词: 区域研究, 地中海文化区, 话语, 反身性

Abstract: Two points are vital for the survival and florescence of area studies as an interdisciplinary research field. First, specialists in each group must focus on the discursive nature of what they do, rather than treating it as somehow a natural condition of the universe. Second, they must talk to each other. Area studies can hardly expect to flourish except by embracing an intellectual attitude that is both critically self-aware and radically comparative.

Key words: area studies, Mediterranean cultural area, discourse, reflexivity

迈克尔·赫兹菲尔德. 区域研究中的话语、比较与反身性[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 52(4): 77-84.

Michael HERZFELD. Discourse, Comparison, and Reflexivity in Area Studies[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 77-84.

参考文献

Austin, J.L.(1962) 1975. How to Do Things With Words, J.O. Urmson and Marina Sbisà(eds). Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
Ben-Yehoyada, Naor. 2014. Transnational Political Cosmology:A Central Mediterranean Example. Comparative Studies in Society and History 56:870-901.
——.2017. The Mediterranean Incarnate:Region Formation between Sicily and Tunisia Since World War II. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Bentley, G. Carter. 1986. Indigenous States of Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 15:275-305.
Bowen, John R. 2000. The Inseparability of Area and Discipline in Southeast Asian Studies:A View from the United States. Moussons. Recherche en sciences humaines sur l'Asie du Sud-Est 1:3-19.
Braudel, Fernand. 1973. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II. Translated by Siân Reynolds. New York:Harper and Row.
Cabot, Heath. Forthcoming. The Business of Anthropology and the European Refugee Machine. American Ethnologist.
Cartelli, Philip. 2018. Marseille vs. the Mediterranean:Local Practices of Digital Resistance. Ethnologia Europaea 48.1.
de Pina-Cabral, João. 1989. The Mediterranean as a Category of Regional Comparison:A Critical View. Current Anthropology 30:399-406.
Fassin, Didier. 2011. Humanitarian Reason:A Moral History of the Present. Berkeley:University of California Press.
Handler, Richard. 1985. On Having a Culture:Nationalism and the Preservation of Quebec's Patrimoine. In G. Stocking, ed., History of anthropology vol.3:Objects and Others (Madison:University of Wisconsin Press), pp.192-217.
Herzfeld, Michael. 1980. Honour and Shame:Some Problems in the Comparative Analysis of Moral Systems, Man, n.s., 15:339-351.
——.1984. The Horns of the Mediterraneanist Dilemma. American Ethnologist 11:439-454.
——.1986. On Some Rhetorical Uses of Iconicity in Cultural Ideologies. In Paul Bouissac, Michael Herzfeld, and Roland Posner, eds., Iconicity:Essays on the Nature of Culture(Tübingen:Stauffenburg, Probleme der Semiotik), pp.401-419.
——.1987a. Anthropology through the Looking-Glass:Critical Ethnography in the Margins of Europe. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
——.1987b. "As in Your Own House":Hospitality, Ethnography, and the Stereotype of Mediterranean Society. In David D. Gilmore, ed., Honor and Shame and the Unity of the Mediterranean(Special Publication No.22) (Washington, D.C.:American Anthropological Association), pp.75-89.
——.2002. The Absent Presence:Discourses of Crypto-Colonialism. South Atlantic Quarterly 101:899-926.
——.2005. Practical Mediterraneanism:Excuses for Everything, from Epistemology to Eating. In William V.Harris, ed., Rethinking the Mediterranean(Oxford:Oxford University Press), pp.45-63.
——.2014. Po-Mo Med. In Peregrine Horden and Sharon Kinoshita, eds., A Companion to Mediterranean History(Chichester:Wiley Blackwell), pp.122-136.
——.2018. Anthropological Realism in a Scientistic Age. Anthropological Theory 118:129-150.
Holmes, Douglas R. 2013. Economy of Words:Communicative Imperatives in Central Banks. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
King, Victor T. 2005. Defining Southeast Asia and the Crisis in Area Studies:Personal Reflections on a Region. Working papers in contemporary Asian studies 13(Lund:Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University).
Ku Kun-Hui and Thomas Gibson. 2019. Hierarchy and Egalitarianism in Austronesia. Anthropological Forum, forthcoming. DOI:10.1080/00664677.2019.1626216.
Lever, Alison. 1986. Honour as a Red Herring. Critique of Anthropology 6:83-106.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1963. Structural Anthropology. Vol.1. Trans. Clare Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf. New York:Basic Books.
Macpherson, C.B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism:From Hobbes to Locke. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Quigley, Carroll. 1973. Mexican National Character and Circum-Mediterranean Personality Structure. American Anthropologist 75:319-322.
Rabinow, Paul. 1989. French Modern:Norms and Forms of the Social Environment. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
Reed-Danahay, Deborah. 2005. Locating Bourdieu. Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. New York:Basic Books.
Scott, James C. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed:An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven:Yale University Press.
Steedly, Mary. 1999. The State of Culture Theory in the Anthropology of Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 28:431-454.
Thongchai Winichakul. 2014. Asian Studies across Academies. Journal of Asian Studies 73:879-897.
Wimmer, Andreas, and Nina Glick Schiller. 2002. "Methodological Nationalism and Beyond:Nation-State Building, Migration and the Social Sciences". Global Networks 2:301-334.

[1]	戴兆国. 做事的伦理之道——当代伦理学的话语转向[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 55(2): 35-49.
[2]	李克, 朱虹宇. 共情修辞视域下的国家外部认同建构[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 54(2): 110-118.
[3]	张虹倩, 冷知霖, 赵诗篇. 众声喧哗中全球智库的疫情话语——基于布鲁金斯报告的框架分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 54(2): 119-129.
[4]	胡芮. 严复与近代儒家伦理话语体系的古今之变[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 53(2): 22-29.
[5]	胡键. 语言、话语与中国的对外传播[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 53(2): 74-83.
[6]	梁志. “导火索”:驻韩美军裁减问题与美韩关系(1948-1979)[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 53(1): 46-56.
[7]	胡键. 政治的话语分析范式[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 52(3): 58-69.
[8]	叶淑兰, 易妍, 王乃一. 菲律宾媒体南海话语合法性的构建:基于甘姆森“诠释包裹”的框架分析[J]. 华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 51(6): 120-128.
[9]	胡伟希. 文体、风格、话语与“喻”——论人文学文本的构成[J]. 华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 51(2): 17-31.
[10]	许纪霖. 五四新文化运动中“旧派中的新派”[J]. 华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 51(1): 24-36.
[11]	高兆明. 伦理学与话语体系——如何再写“中国伦理学”[J]. 华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 50(1): 9-14.
[12]	朱建军, 唐依力. “好像”的历时考察及其最新发展“好像”的历时考察及其最新发展[J]. 华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 49(5): 159-164.
[13]	赵翠翠. 启蒙话语与中国信仰秩序[J]. 华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 49(3): 56-60.
[14]	雷伟平. 上海当代三官神话的地方话语及其变迁研究——以上海青浦区A村为例[J]. 华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 49(3): 94-101.
[15]	袁一丹. “国民”的隐现 ——沦陷后期周作人的反启蒙姿态[J]. 华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版), 2016, 48(2): 112-119.