华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 27-35.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2025.04.002

• 重启科技与人文对话 • 上一篇    下一篇

开源人工智能“伦理－技术共构”的治理范式演进

徐进, 王珏   

  • 接受日期:2025-06-28 出版日期:2025-07-15 发布日期:2025-07-31
  • 作者简介:徐进，东南大学物理学院副教授（南京，211189）
    王珏，东南大学人文学院教授
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省社会科学基金项目“‘信息茧房’效应对大学生非伦理行为的影响与对策研究”（项目编号：22MLB010）；“中央基本科研业务费”委托AI伦理实验室课题（项目编号：2242025S30043）。

The Evolution of Governance Paradigms in Open-Source AI：Toward an Ethics–Technology Co-Construction Framework

Jin Xu, Jue Wang   

  • Accepted:2025-06-28 Online:2025-07-15 Published:2025-07-31

RichHTML

9

PDF

108

摘要：

以DeepSeek为代表的开源人工智能正在打破技术垄断、推动智能平权，成为不可逆转的全球趋势。在开源人工智能的复合生态中，代码层与社区层相互嵌套、彼此作用，推动着治理逻辑从单向介入转向双向共构，从单一控制转向多元协作，从预设规则转向生成秩序。伦理成为由实践反馈不断生成、演化的价值体系，技术则成为反映社会期待、嵌入价值偏好的动态系统。开源人工智能的治理范式呈现出价值驱动、多元共构、伦理协商与技术共生的演进趋势。“伦理－技术共构”既是对人与技术共处方式的哲学阐释，也是对伦理秩序生成逻辑的预判，回应了开源时代“AI向善”的现实期待，也试图开启一个由人类意志参与塑造、由公共价值持续指引、由技术创新有效支撑的人与智能技术共生的未来。

关键词: 伦理, 人工智能, 开源, 治理, 共构

Abstract:

Emerging as an irreversible global trend, open-source artificial intelligence (OSAI), represented by models such as DeepSeek, is breaking technological monopolies and advancing the democratization of intelligence. Within the complex ecology of OSAI, the code layer and the community layer are interwoven, jointly driving a shift in governance logic from unilateral intervention to reciprocal co-creation, from centralized control to pluralistic collaboration, and from pre-established rules to emergent orders. Ethics has become a value system that is constantly generated and evolved with practical feedback, whereas technology has become a dynamic system that reflects social expectations and embeds value preferences. The governance paradigm of OSAI exhibits a discernible trajectory characterized by value-driven development, multi-party co-construction, ethical negotiation, and technological symbiosis. The notion of “ethics–technology co-construction” not only offers a philosophical interpretation of human–technology coexistence but also anticipates the future logic of ethical order formation. It addresses contemporary aspirations for “AI for Good” and envisions a future of human–AI symbiosis, which is partially shaped by human intentionality, continuously guided by public values, and effectively supported by technological innovation.

Key words: ethics, AI, open-source, governance, co-construction