华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4): 1-9.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2018.04.001

• 哲学研究 •    下一篇

以实践自由为核心的社会主义

汪行福   

  1. 复旦大学哲学学院, 复旦大学当代国外马克思主义研究中心 上海, 200433
  • 出版日期:2018-07-15 发布日期:2018-07-26
  • 作者简介:汪行福,复旦大学哲学学院教授,复旦大学当代国外马克思主义研究中心研究员(上海,200433)。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目"复杂现代性与中国发展之道"(项目编号:15ZDB013)。

Socialism Centering on Practical Freedom

WANG Xing-fu   

  • Online:2018-07-15 Published:2018-07-26

摘要: 作为资产阶级意识形态的批判者和资本主义制度的竞争者,社会主义不仅要通过生产力的发展,消除人的物质贫困和劳动强制,而且要通过社会制度的变革,实现个人全面发展和人与人之间自由联合的理想。但是,传统社会主义理论更多地强调前者,未对后者予以充分的强调。德国古典哲学在继承资产阶级启蒙传统的同时,明确地把自我决定意义上的自由视为人类解放的核心,超越了英法启蒙传统的功利主义限制。马克思从德国古典哲学中继承了个人自主性的原则,认为人类的自由不等于对自然的认识和生产过程的控制,它首先和主要地应该理解为人的自身发展和他们对生产过程的共同控制。马克思一方面把人类对认识和改造自然的能力的发展视为人类解放的必要的前提和条件,但同时又强调,真正的自由王国是在劳动和必然王国的彼岸——仅当人们出于自愿的兴趣并且把自身发展作为目的本身的活动,才是人的真正自由的实现。这一对认知自由与实践自由的概念区分以及实践自由优先于认知自由的指认,必须再次被确认为21世纪社会主义的核心和基础。中国特色社会主义新时代的实践,将在"以人民为中心"的发展理念的引领下,进一步彰显社会主义作为人类解放伟大事业的根本特征。

关键词: 实践自由, 认知自由, 康德, 黑格尔, 马克思, 社会主义

Abstract: As a critic of the bourgeoisie ideology and a rival of the capitalist system, socialism should not only eliminate material poverty and labor enforcement by developing productivity, but also realize the ideal of both individual development in an all-round way and the free union of individuals by reforming social system. However, traditional socialist theories focus too much on the former while ignore the latter. While inheriting the enlightenment tradition of the bourgeoisie, German classical philosophy goes beyond the limitation of utilitarianism in the enlightenment tradition of England and France by clearly regarding freedom at the level of self-determination as the core of human liberation. Inheriting the principle of individual autonomy in German classical philosophy, Marx maintains that human freedom does not equal to knowing nature and controlling the production process; on the contrary, it should be understood as the development of human beings themselves and their co-control of the production process. Although he claims that the development of human ability to know and change nature is indispensable for human liberation, Marx emphasizes that the realm of freedom is actually on the other shore of labor and the realm of necessity. In other words, we can achieve real freedom only in voluntary activities aiming to develop ourselves. This conceptual distinction between cognitive freedom and practical freedom, and the recognition that the latter is prior to the former should be confirmed again as the core and foundation of socialism in the 21st century. Under the guidance of the development ideal of "regarding people as the center", the practice of socialism with Chinese characteristics in a new era will demonstrate that socialism is essentially the great course of human liberation.

Key words: practical freedom, cognitive freedom, Kant, Hegel, Marx, socialism