华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2012, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 116-121.

• 中国哲学与文化 • 上一篇    下一篇

论魏庄渠“天根之学”的静与动

王格   

  1. 中山大学哲学系, 广州, 510275
  • 出版日期:2012-06-01 发布日期:2012-09-01
  • 通讯作者: 王格
  • 作者简介:王格

Movement and Stillness in Wei Zhuangqu’s Doctrine of The Ground of Nature (Tiangen)

WANG Ge   

  • Online:2012-06-01 Published:2012-09-01
  • Contact: WANG Ge
  • About author: WANG Ge

RichHTML

4

PDF

1583

摘要： 黄宗羲认为，魏庄渠的“天根之学”在明代思想史上表现出了某种“转”的迹象，所谓“贯动静而一之”，即这种“转”大致上可以看作是宋学系统向明学系统的转变。但是黄氏未免断言太早，庄渠作为一位“醇儒”，“天根之学”只是试图在“主静涵养”的工夫论基调中完成其“一元化”，只是于“静”中似乎透露出了某些“动”的转化契机。通过以“天根”与“天机”为线索的动、静比较分析，可以管窥到庄渠学说与阳明学诸多学者学说的异同之所在。

关键词: 魏庄渠, 天根之学, 动, 静

Abstract: According to Huang Zongxi, Wei Zhuangqu’s doctrine of the ground of nature (tiangen) reflected a slight transformation from the NeoConfucianism of the Song Dynasty to that of the Ming Dynasty. However, this is not the true story. As a sincere follower of Cheng and Zhu’s doctrines, Wei only tried to reach a kind of monism based on the doctrine of cultivation characterized by stillness, and his doctrine of tiangen might reveal some opportunities for transformation of movement solely on the level of cultivation. Through a comparative study of tiangen and tianji, we can also find some similarities and distinctions between Wei Zhuangqu and the scholars of the Yangming school.